Just Stop Oil protesters in their 80s target Magna Carta | UK News

Two local weather activists of their 80s have focused the Magna Carta on the British Library.

Reverend Dr Sue Parfitt, 82, and Judy Bruce, an 85-year-old retired biology trainer, entered the library and tried to smash the glass case defending the historic doc utilizing a lump hammer and chisel.

The pair, from the Simply Cease Oil protest group, then held up an indication which said: “The federal government is breaking the legislation”.

They could possibly be even be heard asking: “Is the federal government above the legislation?”

The Metropolitan Police mentioned two folks have been arrested on suspicion of prison harm and are at present in custody.

The British Library in London holds two of the 4 surviving copies of the Magna Carta, with the others being held at Lincoln and Salisbury Cathedrals.

It was issued in June 1215 and was the primary doc to place into writing the precept that the King and his authorities weren’t above the legislation.

Rev Parfitt mentioned: “The Magna Carta is rightly revered, being of nice significance to our historical past, to our freedoms and to our legal guidelines.

“However there will likely be no freedom, no lawfulness, no rights, if we permit local weather breakdown to turn into the disaster that’s now threatened.”

In an announcement, the British Library confirmed two folks had “attacked the toughened glass case” containing the landmark constitution in its treasures gallery.

“The library’s safety crew intervened to forestall additional harm to the case, which was minimal,” it mentioned.

“The police had been notified and the Magna Carta itself stays undamaged.

“The treasures gallery is briefly closed till additional discover.”

Learn extra on Sky Information:
Airplane skids off runway injuring not less than 10 folks
Bread recalled after ‘rat stays’ present in loaves

The most recent protest comes after the Excessive Courtroom dominated the federal government acted unlawfully by approving a plan to chop carbon emissions.

The Division for Vitality Safety and Web Zero argued the UK could possibly be “massively proud” of its document on local weather change and the case was largely about course of, with no criticism within the judgment of its detailed plans.